Side by side
Flowable vs Tines
Both stand on workflow automation tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Open source AndroidAPIiPhone+3
Choose Flowable if your case and process work needs standards-based engines, AI-agent controls, or Java deployment options. Flowable Design and the core engines provide free entry points, and the Agentic Case Platform has a 30-day free-access offer. Its deployment model is best suited to teams able to run Java applications or services.
Visit Flowable
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Visit Tines The facts
| Flowable | Tines | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Runs on | Android, API, iPhone, Linux, Self-hosted, Web | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Flowable Platform: $99 per user a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 5 | 5 |
| Maker | Not published | Tines |
| Website | flowable.com | tines.com |
| On workflow automation tools | #1 of 133 | #5 of 133 |
Flowable: what it does well
- Engines support BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards.
- Apache 2.0 licensed engines are written in Java.
- AI controls include runtime guardrails and inspection.
- Connectors directory lists 30 integrations.
- Cloud offers dedicated and shared environments.
What to know first
- The Agentic Case Platform free-access offer lasts 30 days.
- Engines run embedded in Java applications or as server, cluster, or cloud services.
Tines: what it does well
Alternatives to Flowable Alternatives to Tines The whole list