Side by side
CandiSift vs Job-Eval
Both stand on candidate screening software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
CandiSift combines resume parsing, filtering, ranking, and recruiter review in an open-source system. Teams should account for the missing accuracy benchmark and the fact that some documented capabilities are not included by default.
Visit CandiSift Free plan Self-hostedWeb
Job-Eval combines multi-dimension resume scoring with paragraph-level evidence and offers both web and self-hosted workflows. Its free plan includes both evaluation modes, while API access is not offered.
Visit Job-EvalThe facts
| CandiSift | Job-Eval | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web | Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | job-eval.com |
| On candidate screening software | #1 of 36 | #3 of 36 |
CandiSift: what it does well
- Supports PDF, DOCX, and plain-text resumes
- Removes personal identifiers before model processing
- Shows estimated processing cost before batch confirmation
- Keeps an append-only audit log
- Offers Docker deployment and SQLite or Postgres storage
What to know first
- No shipped accuracy benchmark
- OCR, embeddings/FAISS, and skillNER are not default capabilities
- LLM processing can incur per-token costs
Job-Eval: what it does well
- Separate 1-to-5 scores cover four match dimensions
- Surfaces paragraph-level evidence
- Accepts PDF or text resumes and job links
- Self-hosted version batch-scores CSV files
- Free forever; model runs on CPU or GPU
What to know first
- API access is not available
- Self-hosted batch use requires a CSV input
Alternatives to CandiSift Alternatives to Job-Eval The whole list