Boundary vs Cato Client
| Boundary | Cato Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment model | hybrid | cloud |
| Access methods | both | both |
| Supported app protocols | TCP, SSH, RDP | HTTP/S, TCP/IP, UDP, RDP, SSH |
| SIEM log export | Yes | Yes |
| Session recording | Yes | — |
| Device posture checks | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Zero Trust Network Access Software. On Freedom251, Cato Client scores higher on our published basis.