Side by side
boofuzz vs Jazzer
Both stand on fuzz testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
boofuzz offers a broad set of communication options and a workflow for recording and responding to failures. Users should account for its Python requirement, monitoring setup, and incomplete public protocol libraries.
Visit boofuzz Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+2
Jazzer combines coverage-guided fuzzing with JUnit integration and security-focused sanitizers for JVM targets. Its listed platform support and JUnit version requirement are worth checking against a project’s setup.
Visit JazzerThe facts
| boofuzz | Jazzer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On fuzz testing software | #3 of 26 | #1 of 26 |
boofuzz: what it does well
- Supports TCP, UDP, SSL, raw sockets, and serial.
- Saves run data in SQLite.
- Exports test results as CSV.
- Process monitor can detect crashes and restart applications.
- Free and GPL-2.0 licensed.
What to know first
- Requires Python 3.9 or later.
- Process monitor must run on the target machine.
- Network monitor dependencies are not installed automatically.
- FTP and HTTP libraries lack full protocol coverage.
Jazzer: what it does well
- JUnit integration supports fuzz tests alongside unit tests.
- Built-in sanitizers flag several Java security issues.
- Works with Maven, Gradle, and Bazel.
- Supports Linux, macOS, and Windows.
- Free under Apache-2.0.
What to know first
- JUnit integration requires JUnit 5.9.0 or newer.
- Windows support is limited to x86_64.
- macOS support requires version 12 or later.
Alternatives to boofuzz Alternatives to Jazzer The whole list