Side by side
BasicCAT vs locAGI
Both stand on computer-assisted translation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
BasicCAT brings translation memory, terminology, file-format support, and machine-translation connections into a free desktop tool. Note that machine-translation services may require credentials, and its Git collaboration does not include translation memory or terms.
Visit BasicCAT Free plan APILinuxMac+1
locAGI combines translation workflows, configurable QA, and automation in a free platform plan, with AI charges separate. Its beta status and cloud-only deployment are important constraints to consider.
Visit locAGIThe facts
| BasicCAT | locAGI | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | basiccat.org | locagi.com |
| On computer-assisted translation software | #1 of 29 | #4 of 29 |
BasicCAT: what it does well
- Free and open source across Linux, macOS, and Windows.
- Includes translation memory and terminology management.
- Exports Word files for external review.
- Offers LanguageTool checks through API or local use.
What to know first
- Most machine translation services require API keys.
- The sharing server requires Java 8 or later.
- Git does not sync translation memory or terms.
locAGI: what it does well
- Free platform plan with unlimited seats.
- Supports more than 40 source formats.
- Exports MQM findings to Excel.
- Offers REST API, tokens, and webhooks.
What to know first
- Currently in private beta.
- Managed cloud service cannot be self-hosted.
- AI usage is billed separately or via BYOK.
- Desktop CAT tools are more battle-tested for XLIFF files with 50,000 or more segments.
Alternatives to BasicCAT Alternatives to locAGI The whole list