Side by side

Azurite vs DynamoDB Local

Both stand on service virtualization software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Azurite

Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+2

Azurite offers a local Azure Storage-compatible environment with broad installation choices and useful Blob and Queue coverage. Check its documented gaps and preview status before relying on it for unsupported features.

Visit Azurite

DynamoDB Local

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

DynamoDB Local offers a free way to develop and test applications without using the managed web service. Check its version, runtime, telemetry controls, and feature differences before relying on it for a particular local workflow.

Visit DynamoDB Local

The facts

	Azurite	DynamoDB Local
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows	API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	Free or on request
Plans published	1	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	github.com	docs.aws.amazon.com
On service virtualization software	#2 of 21	#6 of 21

Azurite: what it does well

Free and open source under the MIT License.
Supports Blob and Queue storage operations.
Works with Azure SDKs, CLI, and Storage Explorer.
Offers several installation routes.

What to know first

Table storage is marked as preview.
Telemetry collection is enabled by default.
Some Blob features are unsupported or limited.
Table OAuth is unsupported.

DynamoDB Local: what it does well

Runs locally without an internet connection.
Available as an archive, Maven dependency, or Docker image.
Data can persist in a local database file.
Telemetry can be disabled.

What to know first

Not intended for production use.
Does not support point-in-time recovery, tagging, or vector indexes.
Does not support parallel scans.
v2.6.0 and later require JRE 17.x or newer.

Alternatives to Azurite Alternatives to DynamoDB Local The whole list