Side by side
AtoM vs Collabware CLM
Both stand on records management software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Visit AtoM Paid APISelf-hostedWindows
Choose Collabware CLM if your organization manages electronic and physical records through SharePoint and needs centralized lifecycle controls. The 100-user minimum makes it a less direct fit for organizations seeking a smaller initial purchase.
Visit Collabware CLMThe facts
| AtoM | Collabware CLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | API, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Collabware CLM: $192 a year |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | accesstomemory.org | collabware.com |
| On records management software | #1 of 22 | #3 of 22 |
AtoM: what it does well
Collabware CLM: what it does well
- Automates classification, retention, and disposition with centrally configured rules.
- Tracks physical-record inventory, storage, and circulation.
- Legal holds protect selected content from modification.
- Supports multiple SharePoint farms through the Service Application model.
- Includes documented in-process and web service APIs.
What to know first
- The annual plan requires a minimum purchase of 100 users.
- There is no free plan.
- Deployment requires existing SharePoint infrastructure.
Alternatives to AtoM Alternatives to Collabware CLM The whole list