Side by side
ANDI vs wick-a11y
Both stand on website accessibility tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan ExtensionWeb
ANDI provides focused, manual accessibility analysis for individual web pages with useful inspection modules and categorized alerts. It is not a replacement for site-wide scanning or testing dynamic, iframe, or shadow-DOM content.
Visit ANDI Free plan API
wick-a11y adds configurable accessibility checks and multiple report formats to Cypress. Its viewport-only scope and one-analysis-per-test rule are important constraints when planning test coverage.
Visit wick-a11yThe facts
| ANDI | wick-a11y | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Extension, Web | API |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | ssa.gov | github.com |
| On website accessibility tools | #69 of 133 | #73 of 133 |
ANDI: what it does well
- Free and open-source
- Screen-reader output guidance for interactive elements
- Modules cover major page accessibility areas
- Works across listed desktop browsers
- Organizations can self-host a copy
What to know first
- Cannot scan an entire site
- No exportable report
- Does not run in mobile browsers
- Shadow DOM elements are not detected
wick-a11y: what it does well
- Supports WCAG 2.2 levels A through AAA
- Configures rules, guidelines, and impact handling
- Provides HTML and terminal reports
- Highlights affected elements in the Cypress runner
- MIT licensed and free
What to know first
- Checks only visible viewport DOM elements
- Allows one analysis per test
- Voice feedback works only in Cypress runner
- New releases require Cypress 15.10.0 or newer
Alternatives to ANDI Alternatives to wick-a11y The whole list