Side by side
Amara vs Jubler
Both stand on subtitle software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIWeb
Amara brings subtitle editing, collaboration and integrations into a single service, with support for a broad range of languages. Note the limits on free-workspace uploads and the separate per-minute charge for AI captioning.
Visit Amara Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+1
Jubler offers a wide set of subtitle editing and validation tools at no plan cost. Check the VLC requirement if preview and waveform features matter to your workflow.
Visit JublerThe facts
| Amara | Jubler | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | API, Web | API, Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Plus: $24 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 4 | 1 |
| Maker | Amara | Not published |
| Website | amara.org | jubler.org |
| On subtitle software | #6 of 31 | #2 of 31 |
Amara: what it does well
- Editor supports more than 400 languages.
- Exports subtitles as SRT or VTT.
- Integrates with YouTube, Vimeo and Kaltura.
- Plus includes 60 AI-captioning minutes monthly.
What to know first
- Direct video and Drive uploads require paid team spaces.
- AI captioning is charged per minute for paid team members.
- Commercial API use requires contacting Amara.
Jubler: what it does well
- Supports more than 20 subtitle formats.
- Exports SRT and VTT.
- Timeline supports draggable blocks and two-point synchronization.
- Command-line tools handle batch processing and automation.
- No user data collected, according to its privacy policy.
What to know first
- VLC is required for video preview and audio waveforms.
- Generic Java version does not support embedded preview.
- ASpell is suggested for spell checking.