FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

AFL++ vs cargo-fuzz

Both stand on fuzz testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

AFL++

Free plan AndroidLinuxMac+2

AFL++ offers multiple instrumentation modes and target types, with free use under AGPL terms. Consider its hardware demands, macOS limitations, and license obligations before choosing a workflow.

Visit AFL++

cargo-fuzz

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

cargo-fuzz provides Rust projects with commands for fuzz-target setup, execution, input minimization, and coverage. Check the compiler and platform requirements before using it.

Visit cargo-fuzz

The facts

AFL++cargo-fuzz
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAndroid, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, WindowsLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planCommercial license: €20,000 a yearFree or on request
Plans published21
MakerAFL++Not published
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On fuzz testing software#2 of 26#6 of 26

AFL++: what it does well

  • Supports source-available and binary-only targets.
  • Documents fuzzing for network services and GUI programs.
  • Docker image supports x86_64 and arm64.
  • Coverage-guided mutation checks for new execution paths.

What to know first

  • Fuzzing can consume substantial memory or disk.
  • Some listed modes do not work on macOS.
  • Linux installation recommends LLVM 18 or newer.
  • Modified network services have AGPL source-offer obligations.

cargo-fuzz: what it does well

  • Free and open source under MIT and Apache 2.0.
  • Commands create projects, targets, and run fuzzing.
  • Can minimize failing inputs and input corpora.
  • Coverage information is available from version 0.10.0 onward.
  • Documentation includes a GitHub Actions workflow.

What to know first

  • Requires the nightly Rust compiler.
  • Requires a C++ compiler with C++11 support.
  • Coverage requires cargo-fuzz version 0.10.0 or newer.

Alternatives to AFL++ Alternatives to cargo-fuzz The whole list