Side by side
AccessLint vs IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensionMac+1
AccessLint combines pull-request feedback with daily monitoring and evidence reports on paid plans. Its checks can identify issues, but they do not block merges or establish compliance.
Visit AccessLint
Free plan Open source APIExtensionSelf-hosted+1
The checker offers browser-based and CI/CD options for identifying accessibility issues, with scan details that can help locate them. Its automated results are not a substitute for manual and screen reader testing.
Visit IBM Equal Access Accessibility CheckerThe facts
| AccessLint | IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Yes |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Mac, Web | API, Extension, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Starter: $19 a month | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 3 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | accesslint.com | ibm.com |
| On accessibility testing software | #5 of 169 | #1 of 169 |
AccessLint: what it does well
- Free plan includes public-repository pull-request reviews.
- Daily monitoring for one flow on the Free plan.
- Inline comments identify rules and suggest fixes.
- Checks are available for Playwright, Vitest, and Storybook.
- Starter and Pro include shareable evidence reports.
What to know first
- Pull-request reviews do not fail builds or block merges.
- Deploy-triggered scans require Starter or Pro.
- Automated checks do not make a site compliant.
- Passing-flow screenshots are deleted after seven days.
IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker: what it does well
- Checks against accessibility standards including WCAG 2.2
- Available for Chrome, Firefox, and Edge
- Offers Node, Cypress, and Java CI/CD packages
- Combines up to 50 scans in an Excel report
What to know first
- Automated checks cover only a subset of requirements
- Manual and screen reader testing should follow
Alternatives to AccessLint Alternatives to IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checker The whole list