Side by side
3DMark vs sysbench
Both stand on pc benchmark software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidiPhoneMac+1
3DMark combines broad hardware coverage with configurable tests, comparison tools, monitoring, and game frame-rate estimates. Its free edition offers selected personal-use tests, while the full Windows suite is provided through the Advanced Edition.
Visit 3DMark Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
sysbench offers a broad set of built-in workloads alongside Lua-based customization and detailed rate and latency reporting. Windows users need to use Windows Subsystem for Linux rather than a native build.
Visit sysbenchThe facts
| 3DMark | sysbench | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | benchmarks.ul.com | github.com |
| On pc benchmark software | #2 of 73 | #36 of 73 |
3DMark: what it does well
- Free Basic Edition available
- Covers PC, Mac, tablets, and smartphones
- Compares matching CPU and GPU systems
- Includes ray-tracing and API tests
- Supports XML export and CLI automation
What to know first
- Storage benchmark requires separate DLC
- Some comparisons are limited to supported platforms
sysbench: what it does well
- Bundled workloads cover databases, filesystems, and system resources.
- Reports rates, latency percentiles, and histograms.
- Lua hooks allow custom benchmark creation.
- Free and licensed under GPL-2.0.
What to know first
- Native Windows builds are unsupported.
- Windows use requires Windows Subsystem for Linux.
- PostgreSQL support is an optional build configuration.
Alternatives to 3DMark Alternatives to sysbench The whole list