Arrange

Overview

Arrange is an annual workforce-planning tool for organizations weighing team structure, staffing costs and funding requests. It suits planners who need to compare headcount scenarios and preserve a record of funding decisions; its appeal is narrower for teams seeking a broader set of product integrations.

Key features

One plan, two working views

Users can edit a plan on an organization canvas or in a spreadsheet-style grid, with changes reflected in both. That lets planners move between a visual view of roles and a tabular view of plan details without maintaining parallel versions.

Cost estimates and scenario comparisons

Arrange’s published fully loaded benchmark card spans 14 roles, 7 levels and 7 currencies, and estimates can be overridden. The benchmarks offer a starting point rather than a fixed cost model. Scenario comparisons show cost changes, which is useful when a staffing proposal needs to be weighed against alternatives.

Funding decisions and imports

Funding requests can record who proposed and approved them, when, and under what conditions. Users can import PowerPoint org charts and Excel headcount sheets through a review step, then export editable PowerPoint files. These tools connect planning changes to a decision record, though import and export options vary by plan.

Sharing, storage and security

Without an account, plans remain in browser storage on the user’s device and are not sent to Arrange; signing in enables sync. Google and Microsoft sign-in are supported, and users can begin without integrations. Synced changes are validated against plan membership. The privacy policy describes access controls, authenticated requests and encrypted network connections; Arrange says it does not sell or share planning data with third parties or train models on plans.

View-only links expose the current plan structure and costs to anyone who has the link, but not review requests, comments, member lists or editing controls. That is useful for sharing a snapshot while limiting access to planning workflows, but anyone with the link can see the exposed plan information.

Pricing

Arrange uses a freemium model, with a free plan and a 14-day trial. The Pro price is described as a planned launch price, so buyers should treat it as planned rather than a settled offer. The terms say the service is under active development and offers no service-level commitment.

Free is a sensible fit for an individual testing the planning workflow or keeping one local plan, but its two-scenario cap and watermarked export constrain repeated comparisons and polished sharing. Pro removes the plan and scenario caps and adds sync, imports and version history, making it the practical step up for ongoing solo or small-team work. Team is aimed at groups that need collaborators and a documented approval process; its stated workspace price includes five collaborators. The annual-billing monthly amounts are lower than the monthly figures, but the supplied terms do not establish renewal or trial-conversion conditions.

Platforms

Arrange is web-based. Its sign-in options are Google and Microsoft; the product describes no other integrations.

Who it's for

Arrange is best suited to workforce planners who need annual headcount and compensation scenarios alongside org structure, costs and funding approvals. It is a particularly good fit when a team wants to move between a visual organization canvas and a grid, or to keep an approval trail with the plan. Organizations needing broader integrations or a service-level commitment should look elsewhere.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Canvas and grid edits stay aligned, so teams can work visually or tabularly without duplicating a plan.
• Pros: Benchmarks span multiple roles, levels and currencies and can be overridden, giving planners a starting estimate without locking them into it.
• Pros: Team connects funding requests to named proposers, approvers, timing and conditions, supporting a traceable decision process.
• Cons: Free is limited to one browser-local plan and two scenarios, and its PowerPoint export is watermarked.
• Cons: The product describes only Google and Microsoft sign-in, not other product integrations, which may limit fit for teams with established planning systems.
• Cons: Active development and no service-level commitment make it a less assured choice for organizations that require a defined service guarantee.

Alternatives

Choose Pave Market Data if your priority is benchmarks: its free Market Data Lite covers the overall U.S. and one additional market for startups with 1–200 employees, while Pro offers global benchmarks. Choose Nakisa Capital Projects Suite if a capital-projects suite is a closer match; its pricing is not published and it invites buyers to request a tailored demo.

Vena is another paid web option, with Professional and Complete plans priced on request. Workday Adaptive Planning may suit buyers seeking wider platform availability: it spans web, desktop and mobile platforms and offers a 30-day trial, but no free plan. Bridgit is a paid option available on web, iOS and Android.

Jedox offers paid web plans, including Business and Professional, with pricing not published. Orgvue is a paid web and API option with annual invoicing and a committed subscription term. PeopleCoral OrgStudio is a paid option for web, iOS and Android.

Browse the Workforce Planning Software category to compare more options.

Verdict

Arrange is a strong fit for workforce planners who want to connect annual staffing scenarios to cost estimates and recorded funding decisions in one workspace. Its synchronized canvas and grid, editable exports and approval trail are the main reasons to choose it. Look elsewhere if broad integrations or a service-level commitment are essential, and treat the Pro price as planned rather than confirmed.