AI security training is gaining attention inside organizations, but available evidence does not establish the size or growth rate of a global training market. A 2026 ISC2 survey found that 47% of surveyed enterprise security leaders said AI was the most pressing skill their organization was addressing or planning to address through training. That is a measure of priority—not course enrollment, training revenue or a worldwide census.
What current evidence says about AI security training
The clearest direct indicator is ISC2’s 2026 survey of 995 security leaders involved in training decisions at enterprise organizations in Canada, Germany, India, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S. Almost half—47%—said AI was the most pressing skill their organization was addressing or planning to address through training. The survey shows strong interest across six countries, but it does not measure participation over time or represent every country. ISC2’s survey findings therefore support a rise in organizational priority, not a quantified global training-market claim.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Training budgets also point to broader investment in cybersecurity learning: 73% of respondents said their organization’s security training budget increased over the preceding 12 months. That figure covers security training generally, not AI security training alone. In the same survey, 54% said adoption of new technologies or systems informed how their organization identified skills needs, while 53% cited time and scheduling as the primary barrier to effective training. These are respondents’ reports, not evidence that training by itself improves security outcomes.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Three figures that measure different kinds of growth
Workforce estimates and security-product forecasts provide useful context, but neither measures training activity. Keep the measures separate:
| Measure | Reported figure | What it represents |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise training priority — ISC2, 2026 | 47% of 995 surveyed enterprise security leaders | Respondents who said AI was their organization’s most pressing skill to address or plan to address through training; a survey response, not participation or revenue. Source. |
| UK specialist provider workforce — DSIT, 2026 | 417 cybersecurity full-time equivalent roles at 32 specialist cyber-security-for-AI providers, up 51% from 277 in the prior study | An estimate of UK provider employment, not the number of people trained. DSIT cautions that broader provider totals cannot be attributed specifically to AI security activity. Source. |
| Market for securing AI products and platforms — Gartner, 2026 | $2.835 billion forecast for 2026; $4.783 billion forecast for 2027 | A forecast for AI application security, AI usage control, AI governance platforms, AI gateways and other securing-AI categories—not courses, certifications or training. Source. |
| Cybersecurity workforce research — SANS Institute, 2026 | 947 respondents across six regions | A global survey that recommends baseline AI security training for all employees; it does not report measured enrollment or training-market revenue. Source. |
These figures cannot be added together or treated as interchangeable. One captures reported training priorities, one estimates UK provider jobs, one forecasts spending on security products and platforms, and one surveys workforce perspectives.
How organizations are responding
Short, on-demand courses
ISC2’s July 2026 announcement described AI Express Courses as short, on-demand learning. It listed a price of $40 per course, or $32 for ISC2 members, and one continuing professional education (CPE) credit per course. One course uses scenarios to teach how to align AI security frameworks, regulations and contractual obligations. These details are time-sensitive; check ISC2’s course announcement for current availability and terms.
Rank #2
A certification still in development
ISC2 said in July 2026 that it had begun developing an AI security certification and invited practitioners worldwide to help define the knowledge and skills it should validate. The announcement describes a credential under development, not an available certification. Separately, in April 2026 ISC2 said its exam guidance mapped AI concepts across more than 50 core cybersecurity exam domains. That indicates AI concepts are being incorporated into existing certification content; it does not mean each credential is an AI security certification. See the development announcement and the exam guidance.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsBaseline learning for the wider workforce
Training needs may extend beyond dedicated security teams. The SANS Institute’s 2026 workforce report recommends that cybersecurity leaders “develop an AI governance program and provide baseline AI security training for all employees.” This is a recommendation from a 947-person survey spanning six regions, rather than evidence that organizations have already trained all employees. SANS’ report announcement provides the context.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What the growth claim can—and cannot—mean
The evidence supports saying that AI-related cybersecurity skills are becoming a prominent training priority and that providers are developing learning options and credentials. It does not establish a directly measured global AI security training market or show how many people have completed such training. ISC2’s survey covers enterprise security leaders in six countries; the workforce estimate is specific to UK providers; and Gartner’s dollar forecasts concern security products and platforms rather than training.
For readers evaluating a course or credential, distinguish current instruction from a credential still in development, and check the provider’s latest details before relying on listed prices, credits or availability. For organizations building a program, the survey findings suggest practical constraints to plan around: tie skills assessment to technology adoption and account for staff time and scheduling.
Quick Recap
Best Value
Rank #4
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
