ABC News’ September 28, 2026 segment features Colby College president David Greene discussing how the college is harnessing AI ethically and without cutting corners. The accessible ABC page does not include a transcript, so the details below distinguish what the video description establishes from what Colby and other institutions say in their own materials.
What the ABC News video establishes
ABC News describes the segment as a conversation with Colby College president David Greene about how Colby is using artificial intelligence ethically and without cutting corners. The page identifies the subject and topic, but does not provide a transcript or a detailed account of Greene’s answers. ABC News’ video page
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
That means the description supports the broad focus, not specific claims about classroom practices, policies, or recommendations Greene may have made in the interview.
How Colby describes its approach to AI
Colby’s Davis Institute for Artificial Intelligence presents AI as an interdisciplinary, human-centered area of study. The institute says it aims to help the college community become more informed and critical users and builders of AI tools. Its site lists faculty resources and an interdisciplinary summer program that ran June 8–July 31, 2026. These are examples of Colby’s institutional work, not details confirmed as part of Greene’s ABC interview. Colby Davis Institute for Artificial Intelligence
#1 Best Overall
Human judgment in consequential decisions
Colby’s 2025 AI guidance advises against using AI for decisions that require human judgment, including admissions, hiring, grading, and employee evaluation. It directs readers to campus offices for questions involving teaching, academic policy, data privacy, and legal considerations. Because the guidance is dated 2025, check Colby’s current materials before treating it as active operational policy. Colby’s AI guidance
Why faculty preparation is part of AI education
Faculty development is one practical way institutions are bringing AI into education. In 2026, MIT reported that its AI Educators Pilot held a weeklong workshop for 19 participants from seven institutions. Participants explored adapting AI and machine-learning teaching materials across disciplines, combining technical concepts with discipline-specific applications and collaboration among instructors. The participant count describes the program’s reach; it does not measure effects on learning outcomes. MIT News on the AI Educators Pilot
MIT Schwarzman College of Computing dean Dan Huttenlocher said, “The broader goal is to expand AI education to more students by investing in training for instructors.” MIT EECS department head and deputy dean of academics Asu Ozdaglar said, “We want to empower students to become critical thinkers about AI, not just users of the technology.” These statements describe MIT’s aims, not Greene’s remarks or Colby policy. MIT News on the AI Educators Pilot
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
What can—and cannot—be concluded about AI’s impact
The institutional examples point to several distinct questions: whether AI is taught as a subject, used as a teaching or research aid, and bounded by human oversight in consequential decisions. They do not establish a general effect on student learning. The sources cited here provide no named statistic measuring AI’s overall impact on education or learning outcomes.
Colby Magazine separately quoted Greene saying, “And on that one, I would say that what we did has been fantastic and we also undershot the moment given how much AI is there now. We need to keep doing more.” That is a statement published by Colby Magazine, not a verified quotation from the ABC News video. Colby Magazine’s coverage
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
