Charles “Snake” Stuart says he found a Bigfoot body in New York’s Adirondack region and that DNA testing identified it as 58.5% Neanderthal and 41.5% human. Those percentages are Stuart’s claim, not an independently confirmed result. Cornell University says it did not test the samples for him or issue a report, and says documents he posted were not from Cornell.
What does Stuart claim he found?
Stuart says he found the purported specimen in the Adirondacks in 2024 and named it Dack. In reporting by KSWO, he described it as about eight feet tall and 300 pounds, said tooth testing placed its age in the late teens or early twenties, and said footprints were found nearby. Those are statements attributed to Stuart; the cited reporting does not provide independent measurements or a published age assessment.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
In a July 2025 promotional release, Stuart described Dack as a complete body with preserved tissues and scat and promoted an exhibit at the Great New York State Fair from August 20 through September 1, 2025. That schedule is historical, and the release verifies neither that a body was found nor that it is Bigfoot.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →What did the alleged DNA test supposedly show?
WDIV/ClickOnDetroit reported Stuart’s claim that the specimen’s DNA was 58.5% Neanderthal and 41.5% human. The figures should not be read as a verified genetic result: the cited sources do not establish an authenticated laboratory report tied to the displayed specimen.
#1 Best Overall
Stuart’s own July 9, 2025 release said, “Dragging a Bigfoot carcass into a research institution is simply not a possibility.” That is his explanation, not an independent account of how the samples were collected, tested, or interpreted.
Did Cornell test the samples?
No. Cornell University denied conducting testing for Stuart or presenting a report. A spokesperson also said the documents Stuart posted were not from the university. The Telegraph report republished by Yahoo News quoted Cornell as saying: “Cornell did not conduct any testing for [Mr Stuart] or present a report.”
Rank #2
This directly disputes the reported connection between the claimed DNA work and Cornell. It does not, by itself, determine what the displayed figure is or whether any other testing took place.
Recommended Free Tools
Has the body or its DNA been independently verified?
The cited reporting does not establish an independently authenticated DNA result identifying the specimen as Bigfoot. Informing News reported in July 2026 that a complete laboratory report and independent institutional confirmation had not been made public at that time. Cornell’s later denial is a further, directly relevant clarification about the claimed testing.
Rank #3
For a genetic finding to support a claim about this particular specimen, independent reviewers would need to assess more than a percentage or a posted document. They would need to establish where samples came from, how they were handled, which laboratory performed the work, what methods and controls were used, and whether qualified researchers could reproduce the result. The sources cited here do not provide independently verified chain-of-custody records, raw sequence data, methods, or controls tying the samples to Dack.
Even a verified signal of human-related DNA would not, on its own, identify a new species. Sample provenance, contamination controls, analysis, and interpretation all matter. No peer-reviewed study, independently confirmed laboratory result, or independently verified biological identification is established in the sources cited here.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How to read the claim
- Claimant’s account: Stuart says he found Dack in the Adirondacks in 2024 and describes its size, age, nearby footprints, and DNA percentages.
- Institutional response: Cornell says it did not test for Stuart or issue a report, and says posted documents were not from Cornell.
- What remains unestablished: The cited reporting does not independently authenticate the specimen, the sample chain of custody, or a lab result that identifies it as Bigfoot.
WDIV/ClickOnDetroit also reported that the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization database listed more than 220 Michigan encounters. That is a count of database reports, not verified animals or scientifically confirmed encounters, and it does not corroborate Stuart’s New York claim.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
