Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallShort answer: The Galaxy S24 FE’s Exynos 2400e can beat the iPhone 16’s A18 in selected graphics and ray-tracing benchmarks, but it does not outperform the A18 overall. Apple’s chip is substantially faster in single-core and multi-core CPU tests, while Samsung’s advantage appears in particular 3D workloads that depend on the graphics API, drivers, firmware and thermal behavior.
What “outperforms” means here
A processor can win one type of test and lose another. CPU single-core speed affects everyday responsiveness and many lightly threaded tasks; multi-core speed matters to heavier parallel workloads. GPU rasterization, ray tracing, sustained stress testing, game frame rates, video exports and battery efficiency measure different properties.
Therefore, “Exynos 2400e outperforms A18” is defensible only when it names the graphics test. It is not an accurate description of overall phone performance.
The hardware being compared
| Phone | Processor and graphics | Relevant hardware |
|---|---|---|
| Galaxy S24 FE | Samsung Exynos 2400e, deca-core CPU, Xclipse 940 GPU; listed speeds up to 3.1 GHz, 2.9 GHz, 2.6 GHz and 1.95 GHz | 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, up to 120 Hz, 4,700 mAh typical battery, 8 GB RAM; storage varies by market. Samsung specifications and regional specifications |
| iPhone 16 | Apple A18, six-core CPU and five-core GPU | 6.1-inch OLED display; the standard model generally runs at 60 Hz. Apple publishes runtime rather than a directly comparable mAh figure. Apple technical specifications |
Core counts and clock speeds cannot be compared directly across Apple’s and Arm-based designs. The S24 FE’s larger display and 120 Hz refresh rate can make scrolling feel smoother, but they do not make its processor faster.
#1 Best Overall
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate, 1900nits Peak brightness, 1080x2340px, 4700mAh Battery, Android 14, One UI 6.1
- 128GB, 8GB RAM, No SD Card Slot, Exynos 2400e (4nm), 10-core CPU, Xclipse 940 GPU, Bluetooth 5.3
- Rear Camera: 50MP, f/1.8 (wide) + + 12MP, f/2.2 (ultrawide) + 8MP, f/2.4 (telephoto), 3x Optical Zoom, Front Camera: 10MP, f/2.4
- CDMA 800/1900, 3G: HSDPA 850/900/1700(AWS)/1900/2100, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO, 4G LTE: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/32/38/40/41/66, 5G: 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/25/26/28/38/40/41/66/75/77/78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Nano-SIM and eSIM
- US Model. Compatible with Most GSM and CDMA Carriers like T-Mobile, AT&T, MetroPCS, etc. Will Also work with CDMA Carriers Such as Verizon, Straight Talk.
CPU tests: A18 is the clear leader
In PhoneArena’s direct comparison, the iPhone 16 scored 3,264 versus 2,153 for the S24 FE in Geekbench 6 single-core, an advantage of about 52%. Multi-core results were 7,899 versus 6,631, giving the iPhone roughly a 19% lead. PhoneArena test results
Tom’s Guide found the same direction: approximately 3,301 single-core and 8,033 multi-core for the iPhone 16, compared with about 2,161 and 6,836 for the S24 FE. Galaxy S24 FE review and iPhone 16 review
This CPU gap matters for browser and app responsiveness, emulation, code compilation, CPU-limited games and demanding photo or video workflows. It is the most consistent result across the available comparisons, so the A18 is the stronger general-purpose processor.
GPU tests: Samsung wins some workloads
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
PhoneArena recorded two different results in the stress test:
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Rank #2
- The Galaxy S24 FE packs a large 6.7‑inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with adaptive 120 Hz refresh rate, enhanced brightness and a “Vision Booster” mode — ideal for clear, bright visuals even outdoors.
| 3DMark result | Galaxy S24 FE | iPhone 16 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| High score | 3,861 | 4,029 | iPhone 16 |
| Low score | 2,435 | 2,397 | Galaxy S24 FE |
The S24 FE’s 38-point lead in the low pass supports a narrow sustained-graphics claim. The iPhone’s higher peak score shows why it cannot be presented as a universal graphics victory.
Steel Nomad Light and Solar Bay
NanoReview’s aggregated results favor the S24 FE in two newer 3DMark tests:
| Test | Galaxy S24 FE | iPhone 16 | Reported difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 1,769 | 1,579 | S24 FE about 12% ahead |
| 3DMark Solar Bay | 7,699 | 6,781 | S24 FE about 14% ahead |
Yet the same dataset gives the iPhone 16 a large lead in Geekbench GPU Compute: 28,010 versus 16,611. NanoReview comparison These are not contradictory once the tests are understood as different APIs and workloads rather than a single universal power meter.
Ray tracing is the strongest version of the claim
SamMobile reported a ray-tracing-related result of 4,365 for the S24 FE against 4,029 for an A18-equipped iPhone 16 Plus. SamMobile report TechRadar described it as a specific graphics-test win, not an across-the-board performance result. TechRadar coverage
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Rank #3
- The Galaxy S24 FE packs a large 6.7‑inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with adaptive 120 Hz refresh rate, enhanced brightness and a “Vision Booster” mode — ideal for clear, bright visuals even outdoors.
The comparison used the iPhone 16 Plus, not the standard iPhone 16. Both use the same A18 generation, but the Plus has a different chassis and thermal environment, so the result is relevant evidence about the chip family rather than a perfectly controlled S24 FE-versus-iPhone-16 test.
Why benchmark results disagree
- API and driver: Android tests commonly use Vulkan, while iOS uses Metal. Optimization can materially change the ranking.
- Test design: Wild Life Extreme, Steel Nomad Light, Solar Bay and Geekbench GPU Compute stress different parts of the system.
- Peak versus sustained behavior: A first-run score can be higher even when repeated-run stability is lower.
- Firmware and software: Updates, benchmark versions and power modes can alter results.
- Thermals: Chassis size may influence heat dissipation, but it does not by itself prove better sustained performance.
NanoReview reports approximately 70% 3DMark stability for the S24 FE and 75% for the iPhone 16 in one comparison. That illustrates why a higher raw score is not automatically the better long-session result.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What this means for gaming
Synthetic graphics leadership does not guarantee higher frame rates in every game. A meaningful game comparison must identify the title and patch, graphics API, resolution, quality preset, frame-rate cap, ray-tracing setting, temperature, battery level and power mode. Native, translated and emulated games can behave very differently.
The S24 FE is attractive to gamers who value a large 120 Hz display and titles that respond well to its Vulkan or ray-tracing path. The iPhone 16 can still perform better in CPU-limited games or games with particularly strong iOS and Metal optimization. Without matched, documented game tests, neither phone can be declared the universal gaming winner.
Battery and efficiency are not settled by capacity
PhoneArena estimated broadly similar overall battery results: 6 hours 20 minutes for the S24 FE and 6 hours 21 minutes for the iPhone 16. Its browsing test favored the iPhone, 16 hours 48 minutes versus 15 hours 39 minutes, while video playback favored the Samsung, 8 hours 03 minutes versus 7 hours 30 minutes. PhoneArena battery testing
Tom’s Guide described the Exynos 2400e as less power-efficient than the chipset in the Galaxy S24 Plus in its testing. Tom’s Guide review These figures cannot be merged into a universal ranking: brightness, network conditions, software, background activity and test content all matter. The S24 FE’s 4,700 mAh typical capacity does not automatically mean longer runtime than the iPhone.
Choose by workload, not by one score
Choose the Galaxy S24 FE when
- You want a large 6.7-inch display with up to 120 Hz.
- Your games or graphics workloads benefit from its selected Vulkan or ray-tracing results.
- You prefer Android customization, Samsung multitasking and related software features.
- You want a telephoto camera and larger physical battery.
- It is meaningfully cheaper in your market.
Choose the iPhone 16 when
- You prioritize the strongest single-core and multi-core CPU performance.
- You edit video, emulate or run other CPU-intensive workloads.
- You rely on iOS-exclusive apps, games or Apple ecosystem devices.
- You value consistent app optimization and peak benchmark performance.
Do not decide from CPU core count, one ray-tracing score, an unlabelled AnTuTu result, battery capacity alone, or a result from the iPhone 16 Plus when the question concerns the standard iPhone 16.
Bottom line
The Exynos 2400e genuinely beats the A18 in some graphics and ray-tracing tests, including selected 3DMark results. That is the accurate explanation behind the headline. Across CPU performance and general-purpose use, however, the iPhone 16 remains faster. Buy the S24 FE for its display, Android features, value and workload-specific graphics strengths; buy the iPhone 16 for CPU power, iOS optimization and Apple ecosystem integration.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
