FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Wolf vs XStreaming

Both stand on game remote play software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Wolf

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted

Wolf provides a Linux- and container-focused Moonlight server with multi-user sessions, virtual desktops, and flexible application profiles. Setup requires host device access and careful API security, while planned GPU load balancing remains a limitation.

Visit Wolf

XStreaming

Free plan AndroidiPhone
Visit XStreaming

The facts

WolfXStreaming
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hostedAndroid, iPhone
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegames-on-whales.github.iogithub.com
On game remote play software#20 of 27#24 of 27

Wolf: what it does well

  • Open-source and MIT licensed
  • Multiple remote clients can share one host
  • On-demand virtual desktops without a monitor
  • Docker and Podman container deployment
  • Moonlight gamepad and local co-op support

What to know first

  • Linux host required
  • Virtual gamepad setup needs specific device access
  • Multi-GPU load balancing is planned, not available
  • Exposing the API over TCP is dangerous

XStreaming: what it does well

    Alternatives to Wolf Alternatives to XStreaming The whole list