Side by side
Webdar vs Zinstall FullBack
Both stand on backup software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxSelf-hostedWeb
Webdar provides a broad libdar-backed backup interface in a compact, self-hosted package. Its main constraints are the Linux-focused availability, absent mobile backup and ransomware protection, and current single-admin user model.
Visit Webdar Paid Windows
Zinstall FullBack offers separate computer and server tiers, clearly dividing file backup from full recovery coverage. Buyers should match each plan’s included data and storage destinations to their recovery needs.
Visit Zinstall FullBackThe facts
| Webdar | Zinstall FullBack | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web | Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | FullBack Light: $169 a month |
| Plans published | None | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Zinstall FullBack |
| Website | edrusb.github.io | zinstall.com |
| On backup software | #150 of 151 | #146 of 151 |
Webdar: what it does well
- Supports four backup types
- Offers multiple compression algorithms
- Includes FTP and SFTP clients
- Provides encrypted backups by default
- Linux binaries support x86_64 and ARM
What to know first
- Mobile backup is not supported
- Only an admin user is currently available
- HTTPS is recommended on untrusted networks
Zinstall FullBack: what it does well
- Computer and server backup options
- Ransomware protection included
- Total recovery on Pro plans
- USB, network, and third-party cloud destinations
- 30-day trial available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Windows platform only
- Light plans exclude applications and settings
- Monthly prices start at 169.00 USD
Alternatives to Webdar Alternatives to Zinstall FullBack The whole list