FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

UABEA vs w3m

Both stand on game asset extractors. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

UABEA

Free plan Open source LinuxWindows

UABEA offers file reading, writing and several asset-handling capabilities for modding and research. Check its runtime and operating-system requirements before using it, and note that UABEANext is still in progress.

Visit UABEA

w3m

Free plan Open source Linux

Choose w3m if you want a free, open-source pager that can also browse HTML in text mode, especially on Linux. Its documented build requires the GC library, and the project identifies poor online manuals as a current problem.

Visit w3m

The facts

UABEAw3m
Free planYesYes
Open sourceYesYes
Runs onLinux, WindowsLinux
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comgithub.com
On game asset extractors#1 of 24#2 of 24

UABEA: what it does well

  • Reads and writes Unity Asset Bundles and Serialized Files
  • Supports batch extraction and archive repacking
  • Free and MIT licensed
  • Nightly builds are linked for Windows and Linux

What to know first

  • Requires .NET Runtime 6.0
  • Windows requires the Visual C++ Redistributable
  • Linux requires glibc 2.29 or later
  • Font atlases are not supported

w3m: what it does well

  • Free and open source, with a listed price of $0.
  • Reads HTML and lets users follow links.
  • Can open images through an external image viewer.
  • Turns URL descriptions in plain text into links.
  • Permits use, modification, and redistribution with copyright notices included.

What to know first

  • The documentation identifies poor online manuals as a current problem.
  • Building on MS-Windows requires Cygwin and development tools.
  • The installation process requires the GC library.
  • The GitHub releases page has no releases.

Alternatives to UABEA Alternatives to w3m The whole list