Side by side
TestLink vs Testrium
Both stand on quality assurance software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWeb+1
TestLink brings test planning, execution tracking, and requirement traceability into a free web-based system. Teams should check its server requirements and note the stated limits on browser testing and MS SQL support.
Visit TestLink Free plan APILinuxMac+3
Testrium covers test cases, execution, reporting, and automation connections, with teams retaining their own data infrastructure. Its scope does not include test planning or requirements linking.
Visit TestriumThe facts
| TestLink | Testrium | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | testlink.org | testrium.github.io |
| On quality assurance software | #6 of 29 | #10 of 29 |
TestLink: what it does well
- Free and open source under GPL.
- Links requirements and cases to builds and platforms.
- Tracks assignments, results, and testing reports.
- Supports Google and GitHub OAuth providers.
- Documents container and web-server installation.
What to know first
- MS SQL support is marked incomplete.
- The project says it cannot test all browser types.
- Specialized help may require a fee.
Testrium: what it does well
- Free plan has no seat limits or feature paywalls
- Imports test cases from Excel or CSV
- Produces PDF and Excel reports
- JIRA integration can file bugs from failed runs
- REST API supports automated execution updates
What to know first
- Teams must provide their own hosting
- No test planning or requirements linking
- Local development requires Java, Node.js, and Maven
Alternatives to TestLink Alternatives to Testrium The whole list