Side by side
SkyWalking Eyes vs SourceTrust
Both stand on open source license compliance software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxMacWindows
Visit SkyWalking Eyes Free plan Web
SourceTrust combines dependency inventory, license review, and shareable compliance outputs, with review required before publication. Teams should check eligibility and billing triggers, and treat it as software tooling rather than legal advice.
Visit SourceTrustThe facts
| SkyWalking Eyes | SourceTrust | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Per project — yearly: $299 a year |
| Plans published | None | 6 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | sourcetrust.dev |
| On open source license compliance software | #28 of 28 | #24 of 28 |
SkyWalking Eyes: what it does well
SourceTrust: what it does well
- Combines dependencies from repositories, lockfiles, and SBOMs
- Flags packages that need a decision
- Offers multiple compliance and inventory export formats
- Checks for changes from published inventory
- Lockfiles are parsed in the browser before upload
What to know first
- Standard billing starts on first publish or export download
- Free publishing is limited to eligible public GitHub projects
- No free trial is offered
- The product is not legal advice
Alternatives to SkyWalking Eyes Alternatives to SourceTrust The whole list