Side by side
Rush vs Tup
Both stand on build automation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Rush combines dependency management, build orchestration, and package publishing for JavaScript monorepos. Its experimental plugin framework and community-based support are important considerations.
Visit Rush Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Tup provides a platform-spanning, file-based build workflow with incremental updates and configurable variants. The GPL-v2 option is free; commercial licensing requires negotiated terms.
Visit TupThe facts
| Rush | Tup | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | rushjs.io | gittup.org |
| On build automation software | #25 of 42 | #29 of 42 |
Rush: what it does well
- Supports PNPM, NPM, and Yarn
- Builds can be parallel, subset, incremental, or distributed
- Projects can be moved without code changes
- Dependency policies can promote consistent versions
What to know first
- Plugin framework is marked experimental
- Microsoft does not provide official support
Tup: what it does well
- Incremental dependency-based builds
- Automatically cleans old files
- Reports unsafe parallel build descriptions
- Generates compile_commands.json
- Available under GPL-v2
What to know first
- Linux-only file monitoring
- Generated CI scripts lack incremental builds
- Commercial license terms are case by case
- No domain-specific build knowledge