Side by side
QualWeb vs WCAG Crawler
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensionLinux+4
QualWeb combines several access methods with configurable accessibility checks and reporting. Its documented evaluation limits should be considered when assessing protected, unavailable, or unusual pages.
Visit QualWeb Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
WCAG Crawler offers crawl-based accessibility checks, reporting, API controls, and CI/CD integration without a software charge. Its scan caps and automated-only coverage mean larger or compliance-critical reviews need additional planning and manual evaluation.
Visit WCAG CrawlerThe facts
| QualWeb | WCAG Crawler | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | QualWeb | Not published |
| Website | qualweb.di.fc.ul.pt | github.com |
| On accessibility testing software | #60 of 169 | #75 of 169 |
QualWeb: what it does well
- Free plan with no trial required
- Checks WCAG 2.1 Techniques and ACT Rules
- Works online, by CLI, extension, or JavaScript
- Supports URLs, crawls, HTML code, and files
- Generates aggregated EARL reports
What to know first
- Some evaluations may fail or take a long time
- Password-protected pages may not evaluate
- Non-HTML documents are unsupported for evaluation
WCAG Crawler: what it does well
- Checks WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 A/AA
- Groups shared component issues
- Provides remediation code suggestions
- GitHub Action supports CI/CD
- MIT license permits self-hosting
What to know first
- Automated scans do not certify compliance
- Anonymous scans capped at 10 pages
- Higher limits require verified or allowlisted access
Alternatives to QualWeb Alternatives to WCAG Crawler The whole list