Side by side
QAI vs TestLog
Both stand on test analytics software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Choose QAI if your team uses GitHub Actions and wants test-failure context and proposed fixes directly on pull requests. Its free tier is limited in repositories, monthly runs, members, and history; larger teams may need Pro or Team.
Visit QAI Free plan Web
TestLog focuses on importing supported test reports and presenting failures, trends, and performance details in shareable dashboards. The free plan is useful for small volumes, while larger reporting needs require the 9.00 EUR monthly Pro plan.
Visit TestLogThe facts
| QAI | TestLog | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Pro: $29 a month | Pro: €9 a month |
| Plans published | 3 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | useqai.dev | testlog.app |
| On test analytics software | #18 of 30 | #22 of 30 |
QAI: what it does well
- Groups test failures by root cause and provides confidence scores from Playwright traces.
- Posts suggested code fixes and merge recommendations on pull requests.
- Supports numerous frameworks and JUnit XML output.
- Tracks failure trends, flakiness, and cluster history.
- Rules can send alerts to GitHub issues, Slack, email, or webhooks.
What to know first
- The Free plan allows one repository, one member, and 50 CI runs monthly.
- Behavioral coverage is described for Playwright only.
- Pro is $29 a month; Team is $99 a month.
TestLog: what it does well
- Supports three common test-result formats
- Drag-and-drop uploads require no CI configuration
- Dashboards group errors and show execution trends
- Public report links simplify stakeholder sharing
- Free plan includes three reports
What to know first
- Free plan limits reports to three
- Excel exports require Pro
- No free trial
- Web platform only