Side by side
pour vs Squidler
Both stand on website accessibility tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensioniPhone+4
Choose pour if page-level WCAG 2.2 checking, a contrast checker, and multiple access formats suit your workflow. Look elsewhere if you need a scan scope beyond individual pages or a platform outside web and iOS.
Visit pour Free plan APIWeb
Squidler combines user-journey testing with accessibility checks and development integrations. Its free tier supports limited monthly testing, while higher plans add volume, priority support, and full site scans.
Visit SquidlerThe facts
| pour | Squidler | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows | API, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Builder: $49 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Squidler |
| Website | pour.dev | qa.squidler.io |
| On website accessibility tools | #22 of 133 | #26 of 133 |
pour: what it does well
- Free plan requires no account.
- No subscription is required.
- Includes a browser extension and bookmarklet.
- Offers a command-line scanner and VS Code extension.
- Includes a contrast checker.
What to know first
- Scan scope is limited to pages.
- No paid tiers are listed.
- Listed platforms are web and iOS.
Squidler: what it does well
- AI test cases start from a website address
- Plain-English goals avoid selectors
- Scheduled scans and CI/CD integration
- Accessibility checks include multiple standards
- Local testing needs no deploy or tunnel
What to know first
- Free plan allows 10 tests per month
- Builder costs $49 a month
- Pro costs $149 a month
- Full site scans listed on Pro
Alternatives to pour Alternatives to Squidler The whole list