Side by side
Pingora vs Varnish Cache
Both stand on reverse proxy software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit Pingora Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Varnish Cache combines memory-based response caching with configurable policies, TLS support, and tools for logging and metrics. Check supported releases and assess whether your application needs configuration changes to reach its desired cache hit rate.
Visit Varnish CacheThe facts
| Pingora | Varnish Cache | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | varnish.org |
| On reverse proxy software | #28 of 33 | #24 of 33 |
Pingora: what it does well
Varnish Cache: what it does well
- Free plan listed as free
- VCL caching policies compile to native code
- Supports in-process TLS termination and dynamic backends
- Official container images and Kubernetes Helm chart
- Includes structured logs and metrics tools
What to know first
- Applications may need changes for a high cache hit rate
- Unlisted releases are end-of-life and unsupported
- Does not cache data unless it can determine caching is safe
Alternatives to Pingora Alternatives to Varnish Cache The whole list
