Side by side
PICO Portal vs Silvi
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
PICO Portal provides review workflows and several export formats, with plan differences centered on project allowances and added services. Check which option's listed project scope and support match your work.
Visit PICO Portal
Free plan Web
Silvi combines review workflows, extraction and analysis with team features and a free plan. It may suit teams building structured evidence libraries, though access to paywalled papers depends on users obtaining them through a university library.
Visit SilviThe facts
| PICO Portal | Silvi | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Plus: €59 a month |
| Plans published | 4 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | picoportal.org | silvi.ai |
| On ai literature review software | #28 of 38 | #24 of 38 |
PICO Portal: what it does well
- Includes screening workflows and full-text analysis.
- Supports systematic reviews.
- PICO Portal lists unlimited citations and collaborators.
- ScholarIQ lists unlimited projects, citations, and collaborators.
- Exports to nine listed formats.
What to know first
- PICO Portal plan is limited to one project.
- ScholarIQ trial lasts two weeks.
Silvi: what it does well
- Supports systematic reviews, meta-analyses and network meta-analyses.
- AI can suggest screening decisions and extract data.
- Keeps PDF highlights with extracted data.
- Supports reviewer assignments and blinded decisions.
- Free Basic plan includes unlimited reviews.
What to know first
- Web of Science RIS exports are limited to 1,000 records per export.
- Paywalled papers must be obtained through a university library.
- The listed platform is web only.
Alternatives to PICO Portal Alternatives to Silvi The whole list