FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

MockServer vs Wilma

Both stand on service virtualization software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

MockServer

Free plan APILinuxMac+3

MockServer covers mocking, proxying, verification, and chaos testing across a broad set of protocols and deployment options. Its always-reachable health probes are a security detail to account for when configuring an instance.

Visit MockServer

Wilma

Free plan Self-hostedWeb

Wilma combines traffic proxying, service stubbing, and message inspection for development and testing. Teams should plan for its Java runtime requirements and GPLv3-or-later license.

Visit Wilma

The facts

MockServerWilma
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsSelf-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitemock-server.comepam.github.io
On service virtualization software#9 of 21#13 of 21

MockServer: what it does well

  • Free, self-hosted deployment with no SaaS account
  • Mocks and validates against OpenAPI or Swagger
  • Imports HAR files and Postman collections
  • Supports multiple official language clients
  • Dashboard shows live logs and recorded traffic

What to know first

  • Status and readiness probes need no authentication
  • HTTP/3 support is experimental and uses a separate UDP port

Wilma: what it does well

  • Runs as a proxy, stub, or mixed mode.
  • Stub settings can change while Wilma is running.
  • Custom interceptors and response formatters are supported.
  • Docker images and release ZIP files are available.

What to know first

  • Wilma requires JRE 11.
  • Message Search requires JDK 11.
  • The license states there is no warranty.

Alternatives to MockServer Alternatives to Wilma The whole list