Side by side
Millet vs Wudpecker
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit Millet
Free plan WebWindowsMac+2
Wudpecker combines meeting capture with transcripts, summaries, and follow-up tools. Compare the monthly bot meeting allowance and listed Ask AI limit with your needs before choosing a plan.
Visit WudpeckerThe facts
| Millet | Wudpecker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac | Web, Windows, Mac, iPhone, Android |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Plus: $19 a month |
| Plans published | None | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | wudpecker.io |
| On ai meeting assistants | #55 of 82 | #14 of 82 |
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token
Wudpecker: what it does well
- Transcribes meetings and creates AI summaries
- Tracks action items and labels speakers
- Searchable archive for past meeting material
- Available on web, desktop, and mobile platforms
What to know first
- Free plan limited to 10 bot meetings monthly
- Free plan includes 3 Ask AI questions per recording
- Higher meeting allowances require paid plans
Alternatives to Millet Alternatives to Wudpecker The whole list