FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator vs xCAT

Both stand on data center automation. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator

Paid APILinuxSelf-hosted+1

MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator combines server provisioning, lifecycle management, automation, and integrations for multi-vendor infrastructure. Prospective customers need to contact sales for pricing and discuss deployment requirements.

Visit MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator

xCAT

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted

Choose xCAT if you need open-source automation for provisioning and managing large server or VM environments. Consider the consortium's stated recommendation of Confluent if you are planning a long-term successor or migration path.

Visit xCAT

The facts

MetalSoft Bare Metal OrchestratorxCAT
Free planNot publishedYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, WebAPI, Linux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitemetalsoft.ioxcat.org
On data center automation#16 of 22#12 of 22

MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator: what it does well

  • Automates hardware inventory and OS deployment.
  • Supports multi-vendor firmware management.
  • Includes lifecycle tracking and multi-site control.
  • Integrates with VMware, KVM, OpenShift, Terraform, Ansible, and Vault.
  • Supports on-premises, edge, and hybrid environments.

What to know first

  • Pricing is available only on request.
  • Kubernetes deployment requires a customer-provided cluster.
  • Each site needs a Site Controller VM for Kubernetes deployment.

xCAT: what it does well

  • Open-source toolkit with a free plan at no cost.
  • Provisions physical and virtual machines using three installation methods.
  • Supports remote power control, console access, and node queries.
  • Runs shell commands and file copies in parallel.
  • REST API and listed cloud integrations.

What to know first

  • The consortium recommends Confluent as a long-term successor and migration path.
  • Security notices include vulnerability notices dated March 8, 2023, and earlier TLS notices.
  • Support is directed to GitHub issues or an older user email list.

Alternatives to MetalSoft Bare Metal Orchestrator Alternatives to xCAT The whole list