Side by side
Meetropolis vs Tangle
Both stand on virtual meeting room software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIMacSelf-hosted+2
Meetropolis combines a shared virtual office with self-hosting options and documented APIs. Teams should weigh its concurrent-user cap and production configuration requirements when deciding how to deploy it.
Visit Meetropolis Free plan MacWindows
Visit Tangle The facts
| Meetropolis | Tangle | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | meetropolis.me | tangle.global |
| On virtual meeting room software | #9 of 22 | #13 of 22 |
Meetropolis: what it does well
- Provides proximity-based spatial audio and video
- Includes guest access and screen sharing
- Offers a Docker Compose self-host setup
- Personal API tokens control meeting states
- Web client and shared types use MIT
What to know first
- Open-source edition is limited to 25 concurrent users
- Production self-hosting requires a TLS terminator
- Self-hosters must configure production secrets and allowed CORS origins
Tangle: what it does well
Alternatives to Meetropolis Alternatives to Tangle The whole list