Side by side
MeetMind vs Notta
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIMacSelf-hosted
MeetMind emphasizes local processing, privacy controls, and practical meeting outputs without a bot in the call. Its platform status, Python requirement, model download, and optional encryption are important setup considerations.
Visit MeetMind
Free plan AndroidExtensioniPhone+3
Notta combines meeting capture and file transcription with summaries, action items, and multiple export formats. The Free plan's per-conversation and monthly caps are important to weigh against the paid tiers.
Visit NottaThe facts
| MeetMind | Notta | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Mac, Self-hosted | Android, Extension, iPhone, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Pro: $8.17 a month |
| Plans published | None | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Notta |
| Website | github.com | notta.ai |
| On ai meeting assistants | #61 of 82 | #3 of 82 |
MeetMind: what it does well
- Captures audio without a call bot
- Local storage by default
- Summaries, decisions, and action items
- Exports to Obsidian, GitHub Issues, and Slack
- Optional encrypted database storage
What to know first
- macOS is primary for native capture
- Linux and Windows sidecars are planned
- Requires Python 3.12 or 3.13
- Downloads about 690 MB on first transcription
Notta: what it does well
- Supports 58 transcription languages.
- Captures meetings with or without a bot.
- Exports transcripts in five listed formats.
- Offers speaker labels and timestamps.
- Works across desktop, mobile, web, and Chrome.
What to know first
- Free conversations are limited to three minutes.
- Free plan allows 120 transcription minutes monthly.
- Free plan allows 10 AI summaries monthly.
- Pro starts at $8.17/user/mo billed annually.
Alternatives to MeetMind Alternatives to Notta The whole list