Side by side
Medusa vs pycdc
Both stand on reverse engineering tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Choose Medusa if you operate Apache Cassandra and need self-managed backups, verification, and cluster restore options across multiple storage destinations. Look elsewhere if your Cassandra deployment uses multiple data-folder directories, which Medusa does not support.
Visit Medusa Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Choose pycdc if you need a free command-line tool for decompiling Python bytecode and can build the project from source. Look elsewhere if you need native-code decompilation or packaged GitHub releases.
Visit pycdcThe facts
| Medusa | pycdc | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On reverse engineering tools | #33 of 73 | #29 of 73 |
Medusa: what it does well
- Supports both full and differential backups.
- Offers single-node and cluster-wide restore options.
- Stores backups locally or in several cloud and S3-compatible destinations.
- Verifies backup completion, manifests, files, and hashes.
- Retention can be set by backup age or count.
What to know first
- Does not support deployments with multiple Cassandra data-folder directories.
- Requires Python 3.9 or newer.
- Runs as a self-hosted Linux tool rather than a hosted service.
pycdc: what it does well
- Decompiles PYC files to Python source.
- Includes a companion bytecode disassembler.
- Supports Python marshalled code objects.
- Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
- GPL-3.0 licensed source code is free.
What to know first
- Requires a CMake-based build process.
- Marshalled code objects require a specified Python version.
- The repository has no packaged GitHub releases.