Side by side
Look-see vs Sa11y
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensionSelf-hosted+1
Look-see offers broad accessibility auditing with standards checks, visual review, and browser-driven journey testing. It is free and open source, but users currently need the self-hosted path because the hosted version is not live.
Visit Look-see Free plan APISelf-hostedWeb
Sa11y offers multiple test integrations around axe-core, from Jest and Vitest to browser-rendered checks. Its open-source license, presets, and customization options make it adaptable for teams building accessibility checks into development pipelines.
Visit Sa11yThe facts
| Look-see | Sa11y | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Self-hosted, Web | API, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On accessibility testing software | #42 of 169 | #46 of 169 |
Look-see: what it does well
- Checks multiple accessibility standards
- Audits visual, content, structural, and journey issues
- Real-browser testing for interactive flows
- Chrome and VS Code extensions
- Self-hosting keeps data in your cloud
What to know first
- Hosted version is not live
- Project is not yet version 1.0
- Self-hosting requires several setup components
- Google Cloud is the supported deployment path
Sa11y: what it does well
- Free BSD-3-Clause open-source project
- Jest and Vitest matchers included
- WebdriverIO browser assertions available
- Custom rules and integrations supported
- WCAG 2.1 coverage listed
What to know first
- Checks only interfaces supported by axe-core
- Runtime dependency vigilance remains the consumer’s responsibility
- No commercial plans are stated
Alternatives to Look-see Alternatives to Sa11y The whole list