Side by side
LinkedIn Oncall vs MangoApps
Both stand on on-call scheduling software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Visit LinkedIn Oncall Free trial AndroidAPIExtension+6
MangoApps brings employee communications, intranet content, workflows, and services into one platform with several deployment options. The minimum employee or seat counts matter for smaller organizations considering its paid plans.
Visit MangoAppsThe facts
| LinkedIn Oncall | MangoApps | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | No |
| Runs on | Web | Android, API, Extension, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Communications & Intranet: $9 per employee a month |
| Plans published | None | 16 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | mangoapps.com |
| On on-call scheduling software | #18 of 25 | #14 of 25 |
LinkedIn Oncall: what it does well
MangoApps: what it does well
- Works across devices and supports 50+ languages
- Designed for access without corporate email or VPN
- Connects to 200+ systems
- Offers SaaS, private cloud, customer VPC, and on-premise
- 14-day trial is available
What to know first
- No free plan
- Employee suites require at least 200 employees
- Specialist-team plans require at least 10 seats
Alternatives to LinkedIn Oncall Alternatives to MangoApps The whole list
