Side by side
LibreSign vs Namirial Sign
Both stand on e-signature software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidAPIiPhone+2
LibreSign provides self-hosted signing workflows with certificates, audit trails, API access, and mobile browser support. Nextcloud is required, and compliance outcomes depend on the wider certificate, identity, hosting, and operational setup.
Visit LibreSign
Free plan API
Choose Namirial Sign if your signing workflow needs identity verification, SMS authentication, templates or an audit trail. Look elsewhere if you need a platform other than API.
Visit Namirial SignThe facts
| LibreSign | Namirial Sign | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, API, iPhone, Self-hosted, Web | API |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 2 |
| Maker | LibreSign | Namirial Sign |
| Website | libresign.coop | namirial.com |
| On e-signature software | #13 of 68 | #32 of 68 |
LibreSign: what it does well
- Free open-source software with no license fees
- Supports SES, AES, and QES workflows
- REST API connects signing processes
- No monthly document or signature limit
- Browser access works on smartphones and tablets
What to know first
- Requires Nextcloud to run
- QES requires a qualified PFX certificate
- Managed hosting and support cost extra
Namirial Sign: what it does well
- Includes identity verification and SMS authentication.
- Document templates are available.
- An audit trail is included.
- Signing order supports both options.
- API access is available.
What to know first
- API is the listed platform.
- The Free plan is described as providing core signing features.
Alternatives to LibreSign Alternatives to Namirial Sign The whole list