FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

KVM vs QEMU

Both stand on server virtualization software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

KVM

Free plan Open source APILinuxSelf-hosted

KVM offers Linux-hosted virtualization with a broad set of documented VM features and integration options. Check that the host has the required processor extensions before choosing it.

Visit KVM

QEMU

Free plan Open source APILinuxMac+2

QEMU covers whole-machine and cross-architecture process emulation, with disk-image utilities included. Note its platform requirements and the distinction between virtualization security use and TCG non-virtualization use.

Visit QEMU

The facts

KVMQEMU
Free planYesYes
Open sourceYesYes
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hostedAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published21
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitelinux-kvm.orgqemu.org
On server virtualization software#1 of 22#3 of 22

KVM: what it does well

  • Free and open-source software.
  • Runs unmodified Linux and Windows guest images.
  • Supports live migration between hosts.
  • Includes snapshots, nested virtualization and GPU acceleration.
  • Available through major community and enterprise Linux distributions.

What to know first

  • Linux host requires Intel VT or AMD-V extensions.
  • Windows guest drivers are available separately.

QEMU: what it does well

  • Supports both system and user-mode emulation.
  • Includes qemu-img disk-image utilities.
  • Can work with KVM, Xen, and Hypervisor.Framework.
  • Available for Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Free and open source.

What to know first

  • Windows support is limited to 64-bit.
  • macOS requires the latest available version.
  • TCG use does not provide guest-isolation guarantees.

Alternatives to KVM Alternatives to QEMU The whole list