Side by side
Kula vs Mizu HR
Both stand on applicant tracking systems. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial APIExtensionWeb
Kula brings broad recruiting workflow coverage, analytics, and integrations into one platform. Its paid, headcount-based plans and limited sourcing-extension coverage are important considerations.
Visit Kula
Free plan Self-hosted
Visit Mizu HR The facts
| Kula | Mizu HR | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Yes |
| Open source | No | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Web | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | 1–50 employees: $5,120 a year | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 8 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | kula.ai | mizuhr.com |
| On applicant tracking systems | #48 of 233 | #44 of 233 |
Kula: what it does well
- Combines tracking, sourcing, screening, interviews, and scheduling
- AI Notetaker transcribes interviews and fills scorecards
- More than 100 HR and workplace integrations
- Includes conversational analytics and DEI tracking
- Dedicated support comes with all plans
What to know first
- No free plan is available
- Listed 1–50 employee plan costs $5,120 a year
- Chrome extension supports only LinkedIn, GitHub, and Gmail
- Extension requires Chrome version 114 or newer