FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

KTorrent vs WebTorrent

Both stand on peer-to-peer file sharing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

KTorrent

Free plan Linux

KTorrent offers detailed torrent, file-selection and network controls at no cost on Linux. Its listed platform is limited to Linux, and the product page does not provide specific data-collection details.

Visit KTorrent

WebTorrent

Free plan APILinuxMac+2

WebTorrent combines browser-based peer-to-peer streaming with a desktop client and a developer API. Browser download limits and the lack of built-in live streaming are important constraints to consider.

Visit WebTorrent

The facts

KTorrentWebTorrent
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinuxAPI, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published12
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteapps.kde.orgwebtorrent.io
On peer-to-peer file sharing software#23 of 36#27 of 36

KTorrent: what it does well

  • Runs multiple torrents simultaneously.
  • Offers global and per-torrent speed limits.
  • Supports selective downloads and file priorities.
  • Includes DHT, magnet links and proxy connections.
  • Available under the GPL-2.0+ license.

What to know first

  • Listed platform is Linux only.
  • No free trial is listed.

WebTorrent: what it does well

  • Audio and video playback can start before downloads finish.
  • Supports video, audio, images, PDFs, and HTML in browsers.
  • Provides the same developer API in Node.js and the web.
  • Desktop connects to BitTorrent and WebTorrent peers.
  • Free, open-source software under the MIT License.

What to know first

  • Browser clients require a WebRTC-capable seeder.
  • Live streaming is not provided out of the box.
  • Plans are non-commercial.

Alternatives to KTorrent Alternatives to WebTorrent The whole list