Side by side

Krisp Voice Isolation vs Sharpi

Both stand on ai voice isolators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Krisp Voice Isolation

Free trial AndroidAPIiPhone+4

Krisp Voice Isolation combines speaker separation with additional VIVA models and several listed integration options.

Visit Krisp Voice Isolation

Sharpi offers several deployment formats, with different latency and configuration details for each. Prospective customers need to contact sales for pricing and can request sales or engineering guidance on selection and integration.

Visit Sharpi

The facts

	Krisp Voice Isolation	Sharpi
Free plan	Not published	Not published
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Android, API, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows	Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid plan	Free or on request	Free or on request
Plans published	2	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	krisp.ai	augmentedhearing.io
On ai voice isolators	#18 of 23	#22 of 23

Krisp Voice Isolation: what it does well

Separates primary speech from competing voices and room echo.
Includes turn, interruption, and voice-activity models.
Supports LiveKit, Pipecat, and raw WebRTC pipelines.
Enterprise plan includes dedicated engineering support and custom SLAs.

What to know first

Pricing is available only on request.
Trial access requires describing the use case.
No trial duration is stated.

Sharpi: what it does well

Windows app processes audio with under 10 ms latency.
SIP Bridge uses standard SIP/RTP interfaces.
Embedded latency can be configured from 2–12 ms.
Windows app works without internet or cloud connectivity.
Maker says audio is not stored or transmitted.

What to know first

Pricing is available only on request.
SIP Bridge latency is approximately 10–20 ms.
Windows app is designed for Windows.

Alternatives to Krisp Voice Isolation Alternatives to Sharpi The whole list