Side by side
iMindQ vs Labyrinth
Both stand on mind mapping software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Windows
iMindQ combines assisted work, presenting, collaboration, and extensive export choices in a Windows application. Its paid structure separates individual, business, and educational licensing, while the listed one-user collaborator limit is important for teams.
Visit iMindQ Paid LinuxWindows
Labyrinth covers core mind-mapping tasks with automatic saving and built-in sketch nodes. Its unmaintained status, dependency requirements, and lack of repository releases are important before adoption.
Visit LabyrinthThe facts
| iMindQ | Labyrinth | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Windows | Linux, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Individual Subscription: $114 a year | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | iMindQ | Not published |
| Website | imindq.com | github.com |
| On mind mapping software | #66 of 72 | #70 of 72 |
iMindQ: what it does well
- AI assistance is included
- Real-time collaboration is available
- Presentation mode is provided
- Exports include Microsoft Office formats
- 15-day trial is available
What to know first
- Windows is the only listed platform
- No free plan
- Individual plan is limited to one user
- Individual subscription costs $114 a year
Labyrinth: what it does well
- Text, image, and drawing nodes
- PNG, JPEG, and SVG image support
- Links can be strengthened or weakened
- Automatic map saving
- GNU GPL version 2 or later
What to know first
- No active maintenance
- GitHub lists no releases
- Requires legacy Python and GTK dependencies
Alternatives to iMindQ Alternatives to Labyrinth The whole list