FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

ImageCompress.net vs Squash

Both stand on image compression software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

ImageCompress.net

Free plan AndroidiPhoneLinux+3

ImageCompress.net provides device-side compression with detailed output and metadata controls. Its free, no-watermark workflow is straightforward, though default batch and file limits apply until Advanced settings are changed.

Visit ImageCompress.net

Squash

Free plan Mac

Squash combines broad image conversion and batch editing with presets, watermarks, metadata controls, and macOS Shortcuts support. Its free plan covers compression and resizing, while some effects require separate purchases and all listed plan prices are unspecified.

Visit Squash

The facts

ImageCompress.netSquash
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAndroid, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Web, WindowsMac
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published13
MakerNot publishedSquash
Websiteimagecompress.netrealmacsoftware.com
On image compression software#54 of 85#50 of 85

ImageCompress.net: what it does well

  • Free with no registration
  • Images process locally on the device
  • Supports JPG, PNG, and WebP
  • Works across desktop and mobile platforms
  • Downloads individual files or ZIP archives

What to know first

  • Batches default to 10 images
  • Each image defaults to a 10 MB limit
  • Advanced settings are needed to remove limits

Squash: what it does well

  • Batch conversion, resizing, compression, and renaming
  • Supports HEIC, JPG, TIFF, PNG, WebP, and AVIF
  • Layered image and text watermarks
  • Shortcuts automation on macOS
  • Free compression and resizing plan

What to know first

  • Requires macOS Big Sur or later
  • Extra effect packs cost separately
  • Only available for macOS

Alternatives to ImageCompress.net Alternatives to Squash The whole list