Side by side
HCL AppScan Source vs Pentest-Tools Website Scanner
Both stand on web application security scanners. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid LinuxSelf-hostedWindows
Choose HCL AppScan Source if your security or development team needs source-code SAST with IDE and CI/CD integration, custom language support, and on-premises control. Its analytics and compliance reporting cover many listed security workflows. Consider another option if you require macOS or iOS Xcode project scanning, or need published pricing.
Visit HCL AppScan Source Free plan LinuxMacWeb
Visit Pentest-Tools Website Scanner The facts
| HCL AppScan Source | Pentest-Tools Website Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted, Windows | Linux, Mac, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 2 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | hcl-software.com | pentest-tools.com |
| On web application security scanners | #16 of 29 | #12 of 29 |
HCL AppScan Source: what it does well
- Static testing finds source-code vulnerabilities early
- False positives can be reduced by up to 98%
- Prioritizes secrets and IaC misconfigurations
- Supports Eclipse, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and VS Code
- Provides listed OWASP, CWE, DISA, and PCI reports
What to know first
- Pricing is available only on request
- macOS scanning is not supported since version 9.0.3.11
- iOS Xcode project scanning is not supported since version 9.0.3.11
- Windows 10 and Server 2016 are unsupported in version 10.11.0
Pentest-Tools Website Scanner: what it does well
Alternatives to HCL AppScan Source Alternatives to Pentest-Tools Website Scanner The whole list