Side by side
Gulp vs Oxc
Both stand on javascript build tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Choose Gulp if you want JavaScript-defined tasks, stream-based file processing, and control over sequential or concurrent task execution. Look elsewhere if your workflow depends on synchronous tasks, since Gulp requires asynchronous completion signals.
Visit Gulp Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Oxc brings multiple JavaScript development tools into one free collection, with broad lint rules and formatter support. The experimental runner has explicit limitations, so it should not be treated as a type checker.
Visit OxcThe facts
| Gulp | Oxc | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | gulpjs.com | oxc.rs |
| On javascript build tools | #8 of 27 | #4 of 27 |
Gulp: what it does well
- Free toolkit with an MIT license.
- Compose tasks sequentially or concurrently.
- Transform files through in-memory streams and plugins.
- Watch matching files for creation, changes, or deletion.
- Supports Linux, macOS, Windows, TypeScript, and source maps.
What to know first
- Synchronous tasks are unsupported.
- Tasks must signal completion asynchronously.
- Setup requires Node.js, npm, and npx.
Oxc: what it does well
- Toolchain includes a linter, formatter and minifier
- Oxlint includes more than 870 rules
- Oxfmt can sort imports and package fields
- Runs on Linux, macOS and Windows
What to know first
- Experimental runner does not type-check programs
- Runner APIs and behavior may change between releases
- Oxlint's speed comparison is stated as a project claim