Side by side
Goose vs Tsung
Both stand on performance testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hosted
Goose provides code-driven load testing with aggregated metrics and flexible deployment. Teams should consider its Rust workflow and incomplete control interface before adopting it.
Visit Goose Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
Tsung offers broad protocol coverage, distributed load generation, and detailed benchmark reporting at no listed cost. Check the experimental plugin status and setup requirements against your intended workload.
Visit TsungThe facts
| Goose | Tsung | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | tag1.com | tsung.readthedocs.io |
| On performance testing software | #22 of 38 | #18 of 38 |
Goose: what it does well
- Open-source Apache-2.0 license
- Rust tests can use all CPU cores
- Supports Manager and Worker distributed tests
- Aggregates metrics into comparison reports
- Self-hosted and on-premise deployment
What to know first
- Tests require Rust coding
- Browser-based testing is not supported
- Full control-and-monitoring UI remains in progress
- Dashboard is opt-in
Tsung: what it does well
- Simulates thousands of users on one CPU.
- Distributes load across a client cluster.
- Supports HTTP, PostgreSQL, LDAP, and other protocols.
- Reports response times, errors, and server metrics.
- Free under GNU General Public License version 2.
What to know first
- MySQL, WebSocket, AMQP, and MQTT plugins are experimental.
- Distributed runs require passwordless SSH or rsh.
- Requires Erlang/OTP R16B03 or later.