Side by side
Google Agent Search vs SWIRL AI Search
Both stand on ai enterprise search software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIWeb
Visit Google Agent Search 
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
SWIRL is designed for organizations that need search across distributed systems without moving source content. Its annual licensing starts with a departmental plan, while the Semantic Cache has separate licensing.
Visit SWIRL AI SearchThe facts
| Google Agent Search | SWIRL AI Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Web | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | See the plans | Departmental: $24,000 a year |
| Plans published | 12 | 5 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cloud.google.com | swirlaiconnect.com |
| On ai enterprise search software | #5 of 26 | #9 of 26 |
Google Agent Search: what it does well
SWIRL AI Search: what it does well
- Preserves source permissions during live searches.
- Answers include citations and can flag unsupported claims.
- Lists more than 150 connectors.
- Supports more than 100 LLMs.
- Can be deployed on-prem, in a private VPC, or cloud tenant.
What to know first
- Departmental annual licensing is $24,000 a year.
- Semantic Cache is separately licensed.
- Formal regulatory compliance depends on customer-configured controls.
Alternatives to Google Agent Search Alternatives to SWIRL AI Search The whole list