Side by side
GitLab Model Experiments vs LUML Flow
Both stand on ml experiment tracking software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Visit GitLab Model Experiments 
Free plan
Flow combines private local tracking with optional registry sharing and broad framework integrations. Its free local use is distinct from account-based collaboration and paid plan support.
Visit LUML FlowThe facts
| GitLab Model Experiments | LUML Flow | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Not published |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | docs.gitlab.com | luml.ai |
| On ml experiment tracking software | #26 of 39 | #22 of 39 |
GitLab Model Experiments: what it does well
LUML Flow: what it does well
- Works offline without an account
- Local experiments stay in SQLite until upload
- Tracks parameters, metrics, artifacts, and traces
- Supports many ML and LLM integrations
- Uploaded runs become versioned registry artifacts
What to know first
- Account required for shared-workspace uploads
- Paid plans start at €79/mo annually
- Local dashboard requires the `lumlflow ui` command
Alternatives to GitLab Model Experiments Alternatives to LUML Flow The whole list