Side by side
GitHub CodeQL vs PreProducer
Both stand on film production scheduling software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan ExtensionLinuxMac+3
Visit GitHub CodeQL Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Choose PreProducer if your film crew needs a shared browser workspace spanning story development, shoot planning and budgets. The seven-day demo lets you explore a project before choosing a plan. Look elsewhere if smartphone app access is essential.
Visit PreProducerThe facts
| GitHub CodeQL | PreProducer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Extension, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | API, Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | See the plans | Subscription up to 5 projects: €59 a month |
| Plans published | 4 | 8 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | codeql.github.com | preproducer.com |
| On film production scheduling software | #1 of 24 | #5 of 24 |
GitHub CodeQL: what it does well
PreProducer: what it does well
- Combines story development, production planning and budgeting.
- Unlimited project staff can use each project access.
- Includes script, department and scheduling breakdowns.
- Imports and exports data with four named screenwriting tools.
- Offers a seven-day free demo project after registration.
What to know first
- It is not currently available as a smartphone app.
- Single-project plans cover one film project each.
- Subscriptions have a one-year minimum term.
- Permanent telephone support is not guaranteed.
Alternatives to GitHub CodeQL Alternatives to PreProducer The whole list