Side by side
ghostmeet vs Wudpecker
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APIExtensionSelf-hosted+1
ghostmeet combines local browser audio transcription with optional Claude-based meeting summaries. Its self-hosted, account-free design gives users control, while summary generation depends on an external API.
Visit ghostmeet
Free plan WebWindowsMac+2
Wudpecker combines meeting capture with transcripts, summaries, and follow-up tools. Compare the monthly bot meeting allowance and listed Ask AI limit with your needs before choosing a plan.
Visit WudpeckerThe facts
| ghostmeet | Wudpecker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Extension, Self-hosted, Web | Web, Windows, Mac, iPhone, Android |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Plus: $19 a month |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | ghostmeet.sshlab.dev | wudpecker.io |
| On ai meeting assistants | #41 of 82 | #14 of 82 |
ghostmeet: what it does well
- Whisper transcription works offline
- Captures audio from several browser meeting platforms
- Summaries include decisions and action items
- Transcripts persist through backend restarts
- Open source under the MIT license
What to know first
- Native Zoom and Teams desktop apps are unsupported
- Summaries require an Anthropic API key
- Summarization needs an internet connection
- Speaker diarization is still a roadmap feature
Wudpecker: what it does well
- Transcribes meetings and creates AI summaries
- Tracks action items and labels speakers
- Searchable archive for past meeting material
- Available on web, desktop, and mobile platforms
What to know first
- Free plan limited to 10 bot meetings monthly
- Free plan includes 3 Ask AI questions per recording
- Higher meeting allowances require paid plans
Alternatives to ghostmeet Alternatives to Wudpecker The whole list